banking services chronicle annual

 banking services chronicle annual 

banking services chronicle annual subscription published this article They did so because of economic and geopolitical interests and they usually installed rabid dictators in place of the deposed elected functionaries. This hypocrisy cost them dearly. Few in the poor and developing world believe that the United States or any of its allies are out to further the causes of democracy human rights and global peace. The nations of the West have sown cynicism and they are reaping strife and terrorism in return. Moreover democracy is far from what it is made out to be. Confronted with history the myth breaks down. For instance it is maintained by their chief proponents that democracies are more peaceful than dictatorships. But the two most belligerent countries in the world are by a wide margin Israel and the United States closely followed by the United Kingdom. As of late China is one of the most tranquil polities. Democracies are said to be inherently stable or to successfully incorporate the instability inherent in politics. This too is a confabulation. The Weimar Republic gave birth to Adolf Hitler and Italy had almost 50 governments in as many years. The bloodiest civil wars in history erupted in Republican Spain and seven decades earlier in the United States. Czechoslovakia the USSR and Yugoslavia imploded upon becoming democratic having survived intact for more than half a century as tyrannies. Democracies are said to be conducive to economic growth indeed to be a prerequisite to such. But the fastest economic growth rates in history go to imperial Rome Nazi Germany Stalinist Russia and postMao China. Finally how represented is the vox populi even in established democracies In a democracy people can freely protest and make their opinions known no doubt. Sometimes they can even change their representatives though the rate of turnover in the US Congress in the last two decades is lower than it was in the last 20 years of the Politburo. But is this a sufficient incentive or deterrent The members of the various elites in Western democracies are mobile  they ceaselessly and facilely hop from one lucrative sinecure to another. Lost the elections as a Senator How about a multimillion dollar book contract a consultant position with a firm you formerly oversaw or regulated your own talk show on television a cushy job in the administration The truth is that voters are powerless. The rich and mighty take care of their own. Malfeasance carries little risk and rarely any sanction. Western democracies are ossified bastions of selfperpetuating interest groups aided and abetted and legitimized by the ritualized spectacle that we call elections. And dont you think the denizens of Africa and Asia and eastern Europe and the Middle East are blissfully unaware of this charade. banking services chronicle annual subscription

banking services chronicle august 2020

 banking services chronicle august 2020

banking services chronicle august 2020 Published this article page no   Islam is not merely a religion. It is also  and perhaps foremost  a state ideology. It is allpervasive and missionary. It permeates every aspect of social cooperation and culture. It is an organizing principle a narrative a philosophy a value system and a vade mecum. In this it resembles Confucianism and to some extent Hinduism. Judaism and its offspring Christianity  though heavily involved in political affairs throughout the ages  have kept their dignified distance from such carnal matters. These are religions of heaven as opposed to Islam a practical pragmatic handson ubiquitous earthly creed. Secular religions  Democratic Liberalism Communism Fascism Nazism Socialism and other isms  are more akin to Islam than to lets say Buddhism. They are universal prescriptive and total. They provide recipes rules and norms regarding every aspect of existence  individual social cultural moral economic political military and philosophical. At the end of the Cold War Democratic Liberalism stood triumphant over the fresh graves of its ideological opponents. They have all been eradicated. This precipitated Fukuyamas premature diagnosis the End of History. But one state ideology one bitter rival one implacable opponent one contestant for world domination one antithesis remained  Islam. Militant Islam is therefore not a cancerous mutation of true Islam. On the contrary it is the purest expression of its nature as an imperialistic religion which demands unmitigated obedience from its followers and regards all infidels as both inferior and avowed enemies. The same can be said about Democratic Liberalism. Like Islam it does not hesitate to exercise force is missionary colonizing and regards itself as a monopolist of the truth and of universal values. Its antagonists are invariably portrayed as depraved primitive and below par. Such mutually exclusive claims were bound to lead to an allout conflict sooner or later. The War on Terrorism is only the latest round in a millenniumold war between Islam and other world systems. Such interpretation of recent events enrages many. They demand to know often in harsh tones  Dont you see any difference between terrorists who murder civilians and regular armies in battle Both regulars and irregulars slaughter civilians as a matter of course. Collateral damage is the main outcome of modern total warfare  and of low intensity conflicts alike. There is a major difference between terrorists and soldiers though Terrorists make carnage of noncombatants their main tactic  while regular armies rarely do. Such conduct is criminal and deplorable whoever the perpetrator. But what about the killing of combatants in battle How should we judge the slaying of soldiers by terrorists in combat Modern nationstates enshrined the selfappropriated monopoly on violence in their constitutions and ordinances and in international law. Only state organs  the army the police  are permitted to kill torture and incarcerate. Terrorists are trustbusters they too want to kill torture and incarcerate. They seek to break the death cartel of governments by joining its ranks. Thus when a soldier kills terrorists and inadvertently civilians as collateral damage  it is considered above board. But when the terrorist decimates the very same soldier  he is decried as an outlaw. Moreover the misbehavior of some countries  not least the United States  led to the legitimization of terrorism. Often nationstates use terrorist organizations to further their geopolitical goals. When this happens erstwhile outcasts become freedom fighters pariahs become allies murderers are recast as sensitive souls struggling for equal rights. This contributes to the blurring of ethical percepts and the blunting of moral judgment.  Would you rather live under sharia law Dont you find Liberal Democracy vastly superior to Islam Superior no. Different  of course. Having been born and raised in the West I naturally prefer its standards to Islams. Had I been born in a Muslim country I would have probably found the West and its principles perverted and obnoxious. The question is meaningless because it presupposes the existence of an objective universal culture and period independent set of preferences. Luckily there is no such thing. banking services chronicle august 2020

banking service chronicle august 2019 pdf

 banking service chronicle august 2019 pdf 

banking service chronicle august 2019 pdf published this article  In this clash of civilization whose side are you on This is not a clash of civilizations. Western culture is inextricably intertwined with Islamic knowledge teachings and philosophy. Christian fundamentalists have more in common with Muslim militants than with East Coast or French intellectuals. Muslims have always been the Wests most defining Other. Islamic existence and gaze helped to mold the Wests emerging identity as a historical construct. From Spain to India the incessant friction and fertilizing interactions with Islam shaped Western values beliefs doctrines moral tenets political and military institutions arts and sciences. This war is about world domination. Two incompatible thought and value systems compete for the hearts and minds and purchasing power of the denizens of the global village. Like in the Westerns by high noon either one of them is left standing  or both will have perished. Where does my loyalty reside I am a Westerner so I hope the West wins this confrontation. But in the process it would be good if it were humbled deconstructed and reconstructed. One beneficial outcome of this conflict is the demise of the superpower system  a relic of days bygone and best forgotten. I fully believe and trust that in militant Islam the United States has found its match. In other words I regard militant Islam as a catalyst that will hasten the transformation of the global power structure from unipolar to multipolar. It may also commute the United States itself. It will definitely rejuvenate religious thought and cultural discourse. All wars do. Arent you overdoing it After all alQaida is just a bunch of terrorists on the run The West is not fighting alQaida. It is facing down the circumstances and ideas that gave rise to alQaida. Conditions  such as poverty ignorance disease oppression and xenophobic superstitions  are difficult to change or to reverse. Ideas are impossible to suppress. Already militant Islam is far more widespread and established that any Western government would care to admit. History shows that all terrorist groupings ultimately join the mainstream. Many countries  from Israel to Ireland and from East Timor to Nicaragua  are governed by former terrorists. Terrorism enhances social upward mobility and fosters the redistribution of wealth and resources from the haves to haves not. AlQaida despite its ominous portrayal in the Western press  is no exception. It too will succumb in due time to the twin lures of power and money. Nihilistic and decentralized as it is  its express goals are the rule of Islam and equitable economic development. It is bound to get its way in some countries. The world of the future will be truly pluralistic. The proselytizing zeal of Liberal Democracy and Capitalism has rendered them illiberal and intolerant. The West must accept the fact that a sizable chunk of humanity does not regard materialism individualism liberalism progress and democracy  at least in their Western guises  as universal or desirable. Live and let live and live and let die must replace the Wests malignant optimism and intellectual and spiritual arrogance. Edward K. Thompson the managing editor of Life from 1949 to 1961 once wrote Life must be curious alert erudite and moral but it must achieve this without being holierthanthou a cynic a knowitall or a Peeping Tom. The West has grossly and thoroughly violated Thompsons edict. banking service chronicle august 2019 pdf

pratiyogita darpan archive

pratiyogita darpan archive

pratiyogita darpan archive  Published this article page no  Divorce mediation has become a more affordable and ‘harmonious’ way to deal with one’s divorce. But it’s significant to note that not all divorce cases are meant for divorce mediation. Divorce mediation has become a more affordable and ‘harmonious’ way to deal with one’s divorce. But it’s significant to note that not all divorce cases are meant for divorce mediation. In cases where you have an abusive spouse, the safety that the Court may provide would be recommended. When you are dealing with a spouse who perpetually argues with every word that passes your lips, then it’s highly unlikely that you’ll be able to confer about concerns of divorce through mediation. As long as there are issues that need to be addressed due to a lack of cooperation on either side, mediation will not quite cut it. In cases where you are having difficulty finding middle ground with your spouse, it would be a good idea to seek the legal help of a divorce attorney instead. Divorce mediation requires compromise</b> Divorce mediation is possible and helpful if both parties are willing to compromise and agree to confer with one mediator rather than seek the legal advice of separate attorneys. This does help both parties save on expensive court fees. Mediation can greatly reduce the total expense of the divorce procedure and you and your mate will generally have more control over the agreement. The benefits of mediation normally help the agreement along, leading to a successful and enduring settlement. It has also been observed that mediation is not as distressing on the children as a full-blown court case with lawyers and all. This point alone can make mediation instantly appealing to a problematic couple. What exactly is mediation?</b> Divorce mediation involves a mediator who assists a couple in coming to an agreement. Unlike what many may believe, a mediator isn’t there to make the decisions for you. Nor will he/she tell you and your mate how things ought to be. A divorce mediator will simply sketch out the matters at hand for you and your mate as he/she assists you in your own decision making. This process is normally accomplished through a series of questions as well as concentration on results rather than dwelling on disputes. Even as some arguments may occur, one mustn’t be so quickly discouraged. The mere fact that both parties agreed to try mediation means that they are able to cooperate with one another. Normally, the idea of how mediation saves their children from further distress can encourage a couple to come to an amicable agreement. How long will it take?</b> The mediation period may be just a number of weeks to even an entire year. It really depends on you and your spouse and the complexity of the matters concerned. If you both are able to reach a harmonious agreement early on, it will be fairly easy to shorten the process of mediation. In order to help this process along, both parties should be completely aware of his/her rights as well as the possible alternatives which are accessible. The mediator will supply the parties with a Memorandum of Agreement. A Separation Agreement may then be written from the basis of this prior agreement. An attorney may be required in translating the agreements. pratiyogita darpan archive